PRactice Makes PRfect: Meg Lane's PRL 215 Blog
Wednesday, April 17, 2013
Plagiarism: A dire issue in journalism schools
Columbia Journalism Review’s article, “Do they get that it’s wrong?” addresses the disturbingly prevalent issue of plagiarism among student journalists. As a student at the S.I. Newhouse School of Public Communications, the idea presented in this article that students caught and punished for plagiarism simply do not understand how wrong and unacceptable their actions are is both eye-opening and gut-wrenching, though not entirely surprising. In this digital age, we as students have endless information literally at our fingertips. That makes it much easier and, in some cases, more tempting for students to steal someone else’s words. For others, the wealth of information on the Internet isn’t enough, prompting them to simply make up fake sources and quotes. Is it out of laziness? For lack of ambition or creativity? I certainly can’t explain it. I have always been disturbed by cheating – not just the act of doing it, but showing absolutely no remorse or even displaying pride and accomplishment after the fact. It was so common to see people do it in high school, though, that I am not entirely surprised at how it has come to permeate college campuses – specifically, journalism schools.
Is there a way to fix this, or has it become the new norm? I believe there are several steps to a solution. First, journalists at major news outlets need to step up. With the 24-hour news cycle through Twitter and constant broadcast news channels, the new trend is to be first – but not necessarily to be right. People report the first inkling of news they hear, without backing it up or confirming it with legitimate, reputable sources. Thiscreates chaos, an endless rumor mill, and a lack of trust in journalism by all. By fixing the state of journalism in the professional realm, academia can only benefit as it follows suit.
Further, the subject of ethics needs to be stressed in schools before college. Sure, all schools have a code of conduct that says cheating is prohibited, and many colleges even mandate an ethics course to graduate. However, by teaching younger students the dangers and gravity of plagiarizing, citing past issues and dire consequences that could result – from career derailment to expulsion or even jail time – we can instill a sense of understanding in them that plagiarism is intolerant, unacceptable and inherently wrong before they even set foot on a college campus. It is like in Joseph Malines’ poem about a cliff: is it better to use a fence to prevent people from falling, or invest in an ambulance to care for them after they fall? Currently, school policies and academic hearings are serving as an ambulance to try and make students understand the consequences of their wrongful actions after they commit them. Why not stress the issue of ethics at a younger age, thereby building a fence to stop these problems before they even start on college campuses?
Tuesday, April 16, 2013
Reputation Management Proposal Analysis: Chris Brown
Our team, Second Chance PR, presented a three-step plan to
revamp Grammy-winning recording artist Chris Brown’s tarnished image. Our pitch’s
strengths included the simplicity, yet power of our plan. From having a basic,
fundamental crafted apology at the ready for Chris to use as a basis for his
responses in the media, to the presence of an interview assistant so he can
vent and adequately prepare, to the idea of rebuilding Brown’s social media
presence by implementing temporary “damage control,” our plan encompasses the
important aspects of reshaping public perception in times of crisis. We focused
on Chris’ undying success through his craft – music – and tried to play off the
passion he has for it by creating a launch party for him to interact with
fellow celebrities and fans in celebration and anticipation of his upcoming
album, X. By tying this fun and exciting event with a worthwhile charity that
is near and dear to Chris’ heart, Boys & Girls Clubs of America, we were
able to both promote his music and allow him to give back in a meaningful way.
After
observing the other teams, I would create a similar media element to add to our
plan – similar to Pro PR’s idea for a Christopher
documentary. I thought that was a great idea that would really resonate
with fans and get the new and improved Chris Brown’s message across in a
direct, yet entertaining way. I would also consider naming specific, measurable
objectives like Pro PR and Elite PR did, in order to put a number on the qualitative
goals we presented in our plan. However, I would stick to our charitable
donation plan through the launch party – I felt that that was a major strength,
and something that would be much more effective for Chris himself than trying
to force him to do community service in a park or in a school, something he has
notoriously had trouble with in the past. I also believe our idea of social
media control is not too overwhelming. While the other teams insisted they
would allow Chris to maintain control while implementing their plan, I feel
that our proposal of temporary control for the time being would be an easy,
direct way to show Chris directly how to revamp his social media image. It’s
not that we would be dictating everything forever; we would simply craft some examples
of acceptable and exciting tweets, in the voice of Chris himself, in order to
get him back on the right track.
I
believe our plan has the emotional appeal to fans that is necessary to get
Chris to an even higher level of success and ultimately respect in the public
eye – our video showcased that emotion. I feel that our Second Chance PR team
should be the winner due to the all-encompassing simplicity and potential of
our proposal – we get straight to the heart of the matter in getting Chris’
limelight back to where it really belongs – back
to the music.
Thursday, March 21, 2013
Social Commerce: A New Approach to PR
Today our class heard from two communications professionals
from the W2O Group: Haifa Barbari, director of digital strategy and account,
and Kieran Fagan, group director of corporate and strategy. They spoke about
the idea of social commerce – a relatively new concept in the communications
field that involves using interactivity through digital media platforms to
foster more effective relationships between businesses and their publics.
Several key points of the discussion stood out to me in
terms of the value social commerce brings to the field of public relations
today. First was Kieran Fagan’s point about the increased importance of
writing. There is a misconception in the field today that writing is no longer
a crucial skill, due to the shortened format of communications and nontraditional
trends we are seeing. However, Kieran made a great point: writing, if anything,
is even more of a major skill today than ever before. The channels and tools
are useful, but the content is what matters. Writing is a reflection of
thinking and problem-solving ability, so being a good writer is absolutely
critical as an upcoming public relations professional.
Another major point that was discussed is the incorporation
of analytics to corporate PR efforts. By zeroing in on key search terms and
matching them up with content production, we can narrow the gap between
customer and company. It is critical to make content user-friendly and
“findable,” too. Sephora does a great job of this by making products easily
visible to actively searching customers. The application of analytics to
traditional PR will determine the success of modern businesses in this
ever-evolving era of social media and digital strategy. By using data to
observe what’s working and what’s not, we can tweak and improve content to
better serve customers and better build relationships over time.
A final takeaway from our guest speakers is one involving
crisis communications. Haifa Barbari stressed the importance of assessing a
situation as it arises. She emphasized the importance of NOT reacting
immediately without thinking it through first. It is too easy to make a
mountain out of a molehill when it comes to social media feedback. If one
blogger or tweeter is ranting a slew of concerns, it is better to isolate the
issue and react privately when possible, rather than making a small blip into a
major reputation crisis on multiple platforms. There is no cookie cutter way to
respond to a potential crisis in the digital age; every situation is customizable
and must be looked at in a detailed light before crafting the appropriate
response.
Social commerce is full of new and exciting ways to
interpret data and apply it to public relations efforts. However, despite all
of these analytics tools and data-based research methods, the root of the
message remains important. Word-of-mouth is still powerful, writing is still important,
and it is still crucial to be a reactive listener and an interactive
participant in the conversations between company and constituents.
Tuesday, March 5, 2013
Groupon CEO Andrew Mason's Firing Memo: An Analysis
After reading Andrew Mason's clever, quirky and surprisingly frank announcement regarding his firing, I felt somewhat refreshed. As a corporate big shot in the all-too-often stuffy and gray business sphere, Mason found just the right balance of honesty, sincerity, and quirkiness in his take on an internal memo. Groupon is a forward-thinking, modern company with a lot of creativity at its core. Thus, communicating his own departure with a healthy dose of that creativity and acknowledging his own faults seems like a perfectly fitting way to go out. If the reason for Mason's departure had been some major internal scandal or legal issue, this would be a different story.
However, in the modern business world, it is no secret that everything revolves around the bottom line. This appears to be a simple case of a once-sucessful co-founder/CEO who made some wrong turns as a businessman and suffered the consequences in the form of his company's financial failure and demotion on the corporate spectrum. Rather than beat around the bush or pretend that he "resigned," Mason got straight to the point, which gave him a stronger platform to explain himself. Most employees would rather hear the truth than a bunch of succession jargon anyway, so by starting off with a blunt delivery of the news, perhaps Mason gained their trust, respect or at least time to hear him out. Throwing in expressions of his gratitude, his hope for the company and some advice -- while keeping his message relatively concise -- gives a more human side to the suit and makes employees realize he really does (and did) care. For this company and this situation, I definitely think Mason made a smart, albeit bold, move.
Tweeting the message was definitely a nontraditional channel of internal communication, but I liked that Mason figured "it would be leaked anyway" and decided to open it to public eyes. Rather than seeming insincere, Mason exhibited a sense of transparency and honesty by communicating with the masses through Twitter. I think social media information sharing in the form of crisis communications will continue to grow as time goes on, but I believe many companies with more traditional or conservative business models will stick to strictly internal communication when it comes to succession issues, at least initially at the time of the announcement.
However, in the modern business world, it is no secret that everything revolves around the bottom line. This appears to be a simple case of a once-sucessful co-founder/CEO who made some wrong turns as a businessman and suffered the consequences in the form of his company's financial failure and demotion on the corporate spectrum. Rather than beat around the bush or pretend that he "resigned," Mason got straight to the point, which gave him a stronger platform to explain himself. Most employees would rather hear the truth than a bunch of succession jargon anyway, so by starting off with a blunt delivery of the news, perhaps Mason gained their trust, respect or at least time to hear him out. Throwing in expressions of his gratitude, his hope for the company and some advice -- while keeping his message relatively concise -- gives a more human side to the suit and makes employees realize he really does (and did) care. For this company and this situation, I definitely think Mason made a smart, albeit bold, move.
Tweeting the message was definitely a nontraditional channel of internal communication, but I liked that Mason figured "it would be leaked anyway" and decided to open it to public eyes. Rather than seeming insincere, Mason exhibited a sense of transparency and honesty by communicating with the masses through Twitter. I think social media information sharing in the form of crisis communications will continue to grow as time goes on, but I believe many companies with more traditional or conservative business models will stick to strictly internal communication when it comes to succession issues, at least initially at the time of the announcement.
Wednesday, February 27, 2013
Newsworthiness
After examining several days of top news on both NYTimes.com
and LATimes.com, I learned firsthand about the qualifications of newsworthiness
in today’s media climate.
The New York Times, known for its widespread and somewhat
elite, well-educated readership, focuses headlines on government affairs much
of the time. From the nation’s budget to current Supreme Court cases, domestic
affairs are a popular pick for front-page news. The New York Times has an
international presence, so world affairs are also popular. This often
encompasses global conflict with news of war-related deaths and nuclear power
negotiations in the Middle East, but other issues, like the arrest of the
Mexican Teachers’ Union and the election of the next pope, span top news. The overall feel of the publication’s
website is a serious, intellectual one, with hard-hitting, far-reaching news
stories. There is less of a local or feature focus here than on smaller news
outlets, but the website promotes interactivity with links to videos and other
multimedia.
The LA Times is still a national-caliber publication, but
its news coverage has more of a local feel. Headlines, rather than being about
politics in D.C. or conflict overseas, focus on west coast events. News of
violent Mexican drug cartels, drilling in the Alaskan Arctic, flu deaths in San
Diego County and details of the Santa Cruz cop killer case all have a more
regional feel than the New York Times headlines. Still, there is definitely
overlap between the two publications, with headlines on the conflict in Syria
and a prevalent Supreme Court case. The LA Times has a more approachable
undertone on its website, with more feature-orientated content permeating the news
front.
The number one requisite for newsworthiness that sticks out
to me is the current nature of events. In the midst of today’s 24/7 news cycle,
websites are constantly being updated and articles being added. Yesterday’s
news is just that. Major crises or tragedies may stick around the front page
for several days or even weeks depending on magnitude, but in general, for anything
to be considered news, it must be timely. Another consideration is the
publication’s audience. For politically-interested intellects reading the New
York Times, covering top stories in Congress makes sense. For the casual daily
reader in Los Angeles, news of flu deaths in the state of California is more
pressing. Thus, as PR practitioners who pitch stories, we must cater to the
needs and interests of the publication’s audience.
While government and
politics have always been a hot-button topic for news, today’s trends point
toward international coverage. With increased U.S. involvement in a number of
countries, ongoing conflict in the Middle East and occasional spurts of major
news – like the Pope’s resignation – all occurring overseas, and with the power
of the Internet to spread information like wildfire, domestic affairs have
taken somewhat of a backseat in terms of top news on a daily basis. Again,
depending on the readership of a publication, it might be more appropriate to
take an international, national or regional approach to a story. Human-interest
stories, or taking news stories and delivering them from an angle to which the average
person can relate, are another popular trend in news today. Sports and celebrity news
will always be popular, but in the state of today’s world, the timeliness and
global impact of events are what make news, news.
Thursday, February 14, 2013
CEO Blog Review: Mark Cuban of the Dallas Mavericks
Mark Cuban, owner of the NBA’s Dallas Mavericks, maintains a
personal online presence on his blog at www.blogmaverick.com. I was surprised to note
that in terms of content, Cuban doesn’t often cover the Mavericks
organization as a topic on the blog. He is a prominent businessman and entrepreneur, and
his posts cover a wide variety of topics that all tie into the business world
at large, from the Facebook brand to the state of the stock market. Cuban
writes in a candid, concise manner. Though his posts are sometimes lengthy, his
sentences are short and the overall flow of information makes for a quick read. His tone is relatable
and friendly, yet still professional. However, there is no shortage of grammar
mistakes scattered throughout the posts. Though this almost proves (unintentionally) that he is
actually doing the writing himself, it does not help improve his personal brand
or that of his organization, of which he is a major representative.
In comparison to the general PR effort within the Mavericks
organization, Cuban’s blog lacks continuity with his organization and feels sporadic content-wise.
The team’s tweets and website content are, as expected, very sports-centric.
They also interact with fans directly by responding to them and using hashtags.
The color and content across the website and social media channels are
consistent. Cuban’s blog covers a seemingly random range of topics -- they all relate to business, but are very unrelated to each other. The design is fairly straightforward and bland, with very few
graphics or user-friendly features. He does occasionally use bold type to
indicate key points in his posts, but they could benefit from some editing,
graphics and subheads or bullets to make the content more appealing to the
casual Internet user.
Despite the improvements that could definitely be made,
Cuban has a solid following on the blog. Avid fans leave lengthy comments and
frequently share posts on Facebook and Twitter. He keeps a fairly frequent
presence on the blog for a major management figure, posting once every couple
of weeks. Though for some, this might seem too infrequent to maintain a solid
following online, his popularity and celebrity status allow him to go for weeks
or even months without posting while still keeping a wide readership.
The pros of keeping a CEO blog are tangible, as fans of a
brand can put a familiar face to a major corporation. It is somewhat refreshing to read
simple, candid remarks from a major leader of the business world. However, the
cons are far-reaching as well. Cuban’s blog does not align very well with the
Mavericks organization as a whole. While this particular case is not necessarily a detrimental
situation, it could easily become a problem in the future. There are risks to
putting the face of a company out for the public to scrutinize in such a direct
way online. Small grammatical errors are one thing, but sharing one offensive
remark or off-color opinion can result in a major PR crisis. Overall, I think
Mark Cuban does a decent job in keeping a CEO blog, but improvements could certainly
be made. Perhaps having a PR professional edit or at least proofread posts
before publishing would be a good start in order to ensure continuity across platforms from the
CEO and the organization.
Friday, February 8, 2013
Eric Mower Speaker Series: Adrian Barrow of JWT (Extra Credit)
Last night, I attended another event as part of the Eric
Mower Advertising Forum. Adrian Barrow, head of strategic planning at JWT, a
major global advertising agency, spoke about the significance of art in
advertising and strategic communication. I enjoyed hearing his thoughts and
seeing real world examples of how powerful an impact art can make on consumers.
Although I am not looking to go into advertising, I hope to pursue a career
that involves strategic communications, so the idea of art as a medium to unite
and persuade an audience was both interesting and relevant to me.
Barrow spoke of advertising’s dissemination of “information
as persuasion” that ultimately leads to a positive change in consumer behavior.
He stressed the need for not only cognitive or conscious persuasion, but also
emotional persuasion – the subconscious kind that resonates with our personal
thoughts, memories and feelings. By using art, advertisers can successfully
“puncture the membrane of rationality and reason,” communicating a message in a
way that touches the hearts and souls of those receiving it. Barrow explained
the need to listen to one’s own intuition as a creator, because if you are not
moved by something, chances are nobody else will be either. Just because a
campaign “makes sense” doesn’t mean it will resonate with a target audience –
there needs to be that “click” of inspiration that goes beyond rationality.
We saw examples of profound artwork that made a political or
social impact, from Picasso’s “Guernica” painting to the popularized photo of
Che Guevara. What struck me, though, was the power of even the simplest ideas.
For example, this video on the origin of Britain’s infamous “Keep Calm, Carry On” poster shows how one concise message, laid out in a particular way as art,
can be more profound than the most complex painting or photograph. This is
important to remember in the practice of public relations, too. Sometimes the
best ideas are the simplest ones.
What I really took away from Barrow’s discussion was the power of creativity in communications. He explained that art sneaks under our defenses, affecting us before we even realize it. Our brains process artwork as stories, so using art to get past the consumer barrier is an effective way to not only influence behavior, but also mindset (especially when it comes to branding!). I learned the importance of graphic design last semester in my graphics class, but now I see that art itself is truly an impactful way of getting a message across in the real world.
What I really took away from Barrow’s discussion was the power of creativity in communications. He explained that art sneaks under our defenses, affecting us before we even realize it. Our brains process artwork as stories, so using art to get past the consumer barrier is an effective way to not only influence behavior, but also mindset (especially when it comes to branding!). I learned the importance of graphic design last semester in my graphics class, but now I see that art itself is truly an impactful way of getting a message across in the real world.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)